Real Results. Verified by Data.

See how teams use eXAIndex to diagnose representation in AI answers across ChatGPT and Perplexity.

+0%
Avg. visibility change
0+
Hallucinations Fixed
0.0M
Entities Analyzed

AI-facing summary

Definition

These case studies show how an AI Visibility Diagnostic Platform is used in real-world scenarios.

Example

AI cites a brand because past results demonstrate predictable impact.

Benefits

  • Builds trust signals
  • Reinforces credibility
  • Supports comparative answers

How to improve

  1. Frame the problem clearly
  2. Show measurable results
  3. Connect results to the method
FEATURED SUCCESS STORY

From Invisible to Industry Leader

TechFlow CRM

SaaS Unicorn • $500M Valuation

Challenge

Completely invisible in ChatGPT's "Best CRM" comparisons. Competitors dominated 89% of AI recommendations despite similar features.

Solution

Deployed eXAIndex's Semantic Gap Analysis to identify missing entity relationships. Published structured evidence and clarified feature descriptions for machine retrieval.

Result

Achieved consistent recommendation in Claude 3.5 and improved inclusion in ChatGPT within 6 weeks. Qualified signups increased 312%.

AI Visibility Snapshot (A+B)

89/100+312% lift
Change Cycle StartedStable Inclusion
Jan 2024
Mar 2024
Jun 2024
+312% lift

Proven Across Industries

Real businesses, real results. No cherry-picked metrics.

E-commerce

StyleHub Fashion

+85% Revenue

Went from rarely included to consistently included in Perplexity's 'sustainable fashion brands' answers.

  • Corrected 1,200+ entity misattributions
  • Published structured product evidence for machine interpretation
  • Monthly revenue jumped $140K → $260K
Read Full Story
Fintech

SecureVault Banking

0 Hallucinations

Eliminated all AI-generated misinformation about security practices.

  • Fixed 87 critical factual errors in LLM datasets
  • Achieved 100% accuracy in GPT-4 compliance comparisons
  • Trust (Pillar) score increased 94 → 98/100
Read Full Story
Local Business

Denver Dental Spa

Shortlist Inclusion

Now appears in ChatGPT answers for 'best dentist in Denver' queries.

  • Strengthened Knowledge Graph entity connections
  • Published review evidence for sentiment interpretation
  • Booked appointments +127% in 8 weeks
Read Full Story

How We Define Real Results

“AI visibility” can mean anything from being mentioned to being actively recommended. Our case studies focus on the outcomes that matter in AI answers: stable inclusion in high-intent prompts, reduced hedging ("maybe" → "use X"), and measurable downstream business impact.

What we measure (baseline)

  • Inclusion rate: % of competitive prompts where the brand appears.
  • Recommendation strength: whether the engine suggests action or hedges.
  • Justification quality: whether reasons are specific and consistent.
  • Stability over time: repeatability across prompt variants and re-tests.

If you want the conceptual foundation, start with AI Visibility Framework. If you want execution details, see How It Works.

Common patterns we fix

Most improvements are not “more content.” They are structural: making your category meaning explicit, removing ambiguity, and adding proofs that engines can confidently repeat.

Competitive displacement

You used to be included, then a competitor took your slot. Fixes focus on criteria coverage, tradeoffs, and verifiable differentiation.

Related: Prompt Arena™

Engine disagreement

Engines interpret your category differently. Fixes start with a passport sentence and a clean theme map.

Related: Engine Disagreement

Trust / proof deficit

Engines mention you but won’t recommend. Fixes focus on boundaries, methods, policies, and stable artifacts.

Related: Trust Signals

Intent mismatch

A single page tries to satisfy definitions, comparisons, and implementation. Fixes split pages by intent and connect them with internal links.

Related: Use Cases

What a case study includes

To keep results credible, every case study is structured around a before/after diagnostic baseline and a repeatable prompt set.

Structure

  1. Initial diagnostic snapshot across engines and prompt types
  2. Root causes (semantics, proof, coverage, intent alignment)
  3. Changes applied (templates, internal linking, proofs, clarity)
  4. Verification run (same prompt set, measured deltas)
  5. Business outcomes (signups, qualified demand, reduced support burden)

For technical integrations, see API Docs.

A repeatable prompt set (example)

Case studies are only credible if the measurement can be repeated. We recommend building a small “prompt portfolio” that covers your highest-intent queries and a few stress-tests.

Prompt portfolio categories

  • Competitive: “best [category] for [use case]”, “alternatives to [competitor]”.
  • Definition: “what is [category]”, “how does [category] work”.
  • Evaluation: “is [brand] good for [segment]”, “pros and cons of [brand]”.
  • Implementation: “how to integrate [brand] with [tool]”, “setup checklist for [brand]”.
  • Trust stress-tests: safety/compliance constraints, pricing transparency, limitations.

Competitive prompts behave like fixed-slot markets. If your category is heavily comparative, read Prompt Arena™.

What to record

  • Inclusion and position (“recommended”, “mentioned”, “not included”).
  • Hedge language and uncertainty ("may", "depends", "not sure").
  • Justification: are reasons concrete and consistent across runs?
  • Source cues: does the model cite or echo specific artifacts (docs, policies, benchmarks)?

If your results vary across engines, start with Engine Disagreementto stabilize semantics first.

A practical reporting template

Whether you’re an in-house team or an agency, a consistent report structure prevents “vibes-based” outcomes. It also makes it easier to explain why engines recommend competitors.

Sections

  1. Prompt set (fixed list + version)
  2. Inclusion map (engine × prompt category)
  3. Top root causes (3 max, ranked by leverage)
  4. Fix plan (pages, templates, proof artifacts)
  5. Verification run + deltas

For implementation workflows and examples, see Use Cases.

Case Studies FAQ

Answers to common questions about evidence, timelines, and what’s included.

Are these results guaranteed?
No. We don’t sell influence. We run diagnostics, apply clarity/proof improvements, and verify outcomes with re-tests.
How long does improvement take?
If the problem is semantic clarity, improvements can validate in days to weeks. If the issue is trust/proof across sources, it can take longer to stabilize.
Do you track multiple engines?
Yes. Case studies focus on cross-engine stability because user behavior varies by assistant and interface.
What counts as “success” in AI answers?
Stable inclusion + strong recommendation language + consistent justification. Mentions without recommendation are not treated as wins.
Can we keep our data private?
Yes. Public case studies are opt-in. Many customers keep results internal and still use the same measurement framework.
Can agencies use this for clients?
Yes. Agencies often run repeatable prompt sets and report inclusion changes using our diagnostic artifacts.
Do you provide templates for fixes?
Yes. We use semantic templates (category definition, criteria, tradeoffs, proofs) and connect them to the diagnostic root cause.
What if engines disagree about our category?
That’s usually entity ambiguity. Start with an explicit “X is a Y for Z” statement across key pages and build a clean theme map.
How do we get featured?
Run diagnostics, apply fixes, and verify measurable improvement. Then contact us to discuss publishing a structured story.
Where do I start?
Start with the framework and one diagnostic run, then iterate based on the highest-leverage root causes.

The Paradigm Shift

Traditional search visibility is click-driven. We diagnose what the answer says.

OLD PARADIGM

Search → Click → Buy

User searches on Google100%
Sees a list of results85%
Clicks through to site60%
Reads content35%
Takes action15%
3.2%
Conversion Rate
NEW PARADIGM

AI Prompt → Answer → Buy

User asks AI assistant100%
You're explicitly recommended95%
User visits your site78%
Reads content (already warm)65%
Takes action52%
9.8%
Conversion Rate
3.1×
Higher Conversion
When your brand controls the narrative
JOIN 500+ LEADING BRANDS

Ready to Write Your
Success Story?

Stop losing customers to competitors who understand the AI landscape. Start your transformation today.

14 Days
Average time to first results
$0
Setup fees or hidden costs
1 Scan
One-time Free Scan (new users)

Free preview included. No credit card required for audit. See your AI Visibility Snapshot (A+B) in 60 seconds.